Click here to e-mail us
Join Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter
Watch Our YouTube Videos
Join Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter

dailyvideo

    Savings targets and overspends by Birmingham constituencies: data breakdown

    Some Birmingham constituencies are facing a much bigger budget cut than others, according to new data from the Housing and Constituencies Directorate.

    The constituency of Hall Green, which includes Moseley and King's Heath, Sparkbrook and Springfield is in the process of finding savings in the current fiscal year of £1,814,000.

    By comparison, only £485,000 is savings is expected to be shaved from the constituency budget in Edgbaston which encompasses Edgbaston, Bartley Green, Harborne and Quinton.

    This bar graph illustrates the disparity in savings targets.

    Cd8317e0-e982-11df-935e-000255111976

    The raw data for the graph can be found here.

    Section 188


    The savings targets are laid out in a Section 188 redundancy notice which pertains to the Constituency portfolio of Birmingham Council's Housing and Constituencies Directorate.  The document does not express the savings targets as a percentage of overall budget.

    Not surprisingly, the Section 188 indicates that redundancies may be greater in constituencies that need to find bigger savings.

    As we reported Monday, the likelihood of losing your Constituency job appears to depend on where work, with Hall Green facing the most potential redundancies in this portfolio (94) compared to zero redundancies in Sutton Coldfield.

    Birmingham City Council was contacted for an explanation of why savings targets are unequal across constituencies but a spokesperson declined the opportunity to comment at this time.


    Overpsends 

    A partial explanation for the disparity in savings targets might be found in how much each constituency has overspent its budget in the past.

    The graph below illustrates that all constituencies overspent their budgets in the previous financial year, but some overspent far more than others.

    For example, Erdington carried forward an overspend of £1,102,000 from the previous year while Hall Green carried forward £633,000.

    By comparison, the overspend in Selly Oak was only £11,000 and in both Hodge Hill and Sutton Coldfield it was £19,000.

    5f00e262-ea62-11df-8b55-000255111976

    The raw data for the graph can be found here. (Data was not available for Northfield)

    In all cases, plans have been made for constituencies to repay the overspend over the course of the next three years.  The overspend has been added to the targeted savings for this financial year.

    Posted by Birmingham Budget Cuts on 9:58 AM. Filed under . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0

    1 comments for Savings targets and overspends by Birmingham constituencies: data breakdown

    1. Thanks for knowledge share, I will be waiting for more in future

      Regards
      Marcus White Lisdoonvarna

    Leave comment

    Recent Entries

    Recent Comments